China Correction? - Hewison on CNBC
China is red hot right now, but could a correction be in the near future?
Adam Hewison, of INO.com, and Zachery Karabel, of
Fred Alger Mgmt., share their insight.
Excerpt from show…
Burnett: “So Adam, this sounds very rational out of Zachery, but your saying we’re not just talking about any old correction. We’re talking about something very soon and very large…”
Hewison: “When we look at the market on a technical basis and we’ve been tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (FXI), which is the main index over there, for quite sometime and it charts beautifully. It actually is quite predictable. We’re looking for a high this market, we had, actually its great to be on the show today because we hit a new high over 30,000. But we’re looking for the market to possibly trade as high as 33,000 and then we’re looking for a 20% correction. I’m not going to disagree with Mr. Buffet, he’s one of the best investors around in the history of the world. And, he’s skeptical and I’m skeptical too.”
Burnett: “And your saying 20% in China means at least 10% as a result here in the U.S. Market?”
Hewison: “That’s how it’s worked in the past, we’ve seen a 20% correction In China; we’ve had three 20% corrections that we can track and each time it has meant a, uh, the last one was about a 10% correction in the U.S. So I’m guessing that’s what’s going to happen here.
Burnett: “So Adam let me ask you… I was just looking here at my screen at things that were up more than were up more than 5% today, John Deer was up, Goldman Sachs was up and then this thing FXI was the ticker which happens to be the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index, and that’s the way you would trade this and I guess you would go short that?”
Hewison: “I wouldn’t go short. I mean a 20% decline… I wouldn’t want to sit through a 20% decline, no one, no investor does. But I think if you’re an intermediate term trader you may want to take some chips off the table now with this FXI index, which is the best way I believe to trade the China trade.”
Burnett: “Alright so take some money off the table there.”
To Watch The Video … Click Here Or On Video Image
CNBC Is A Registered Trademark/Copyright of CNBC and Affiliates
Oil Could Face Resistance In Its March Toward $100
Oil Could Face Resistance In Its March Toward $100
By Matt Chambers
Wall Street Journal
Word Count: 432
29 Oct 2007
If oil prices have difficulty clearing the $100 milestone, psychology might be one reason why.
Expectations for tight year-end supply and other factors that have driven crude to record heights aren’t likely to diminish soon. But psychological resistance to triple-figure oil and a nagging feeling that prices have run too high, too soon could keep crude from reaching $100 a barrel before year’s end, as traders decide to lock in gains instead, analysts say.
December crude-oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange closed Friday at a record $91.86 a barrel, in large part because of forecasts for a huge global supply deficit in the fourth quarter, a weaker dollar that has made crude oil cheap for traders using other currencies, and an unexpected slump in the U.S. crude-oil stockpiles, reported this week. Concern about festering Middle East tensions, particularly between the U.S. and Iran, also sent prices soaring. The inflation-adjusted record remains $101.70, set in 1980.
“Buying is continuing in what is a very, very strong market,” said Peter Beutel, president of trading advisory firm Cameron Hanover in New Canaan, Conn. “The only fundamental factors I can see that can bring prices lower is warm winter weather or recession, or profit-taking.”
With prices in uncharted territory, winter not year arrived and recession not imminent, traders are looking at price levels to determine where the next pull-back in prices could be. When fresh factors affecting supply and demand are limited, traders often turn to technical charts, which use previous prices to predict turning points in trading.
Some market participants think oil prices aren’t likely to go much above $95 a barrel without some new event or change in circumstances, at least not until next year.
“I think we’re heading to $95, where we’ll likely see some profit-taking, maybe back to $90 a barrel,” says Adam Hewison, president of trading information service INO.com, in Annapolis, Md. “We’re looking for prices to trade over $100,” but not until January or February, he said.
In the six trading sessions ended Oct. 18, crude futures rose 10%, boosted by the falling dollar and plans by Turkey to authorize a military strike against Kurdish militants in northern Iraq. The magnitude and speed of that rise, and a subsequent pullback after it, is partly behind Mr. Hewison’s $95 target.
Cameron Hanover’s Mr. Beutel doesn’t see major resistance before $97.50 a barrel.
Prices had been heading lower at the beginning of last week, but they shot up after the Energy Department on Wednesday reported crude-oil inventories fell to their lowest level since January.
The Wall Street Journal is trademarked and belongs to The Wall Street Journal
